Page 16 - Shimadzu Journal vol.9 Issue1
P. 16

Clinical Research









            256 x 256.  In the first test, the samples were taken directly out of   times with degassed deionized water and dried under a gentle flow
            vacuum and immediately imaged. In the second test, the samples   of dry nitrogen. The instrument used is a Horiba T64000 Raman
            were exposed to non-degassed water for two hours, dried under   Spectrometer equipped with the microscope utility and liquid ni-
            a gentle flow of dry nitrogen, and then imaged. Contact mode   trogen cooled CCD detector. A 10 X Olympus objective was used
            was first used to generate topographical maps of the sample sur-  to focus the 532 nm laser to a ~10 µm spot on the surface of the
            faces. Next, the SPM was run the Kelvin Probe Force Microscopy   sample. The laser power does not exceed 10 µW. The entrance slit
            (KFM) mode to analyze the surface potentials and give evidence of    of the spectrometer is set at 200 µm. The accumulation time is set at
            surface chemical changes. KFM is a noncontact variation of the   1 second with 25 accumulations per spectrum. The spectral range
            SPM where the probe is held at a constant height above the   extends from 250 to 2250 wavenumbers and 10 scans are taken for
            sample and a voltage bias is applied to the probe and the surface is    each measurement.
            locally mapped.


                                                                                  Results
                               UV-Vis
                                                               First, we present the morphological and chemical changes of the
            UV-Vis spectroscopy is  performed  on  a Shimadzu  UV-3600   Ag nanorods after exposure for 168 hours to air, degassed water,
            equipped with the integrating sphere attachment. Spectroscopy   and non-degassed water, Figure 1. The time of 168 hours is chosen
            is performed in reflection mode with the baseline being a freshly   to get visible changes in morphology. No appreciable difference is
            evaporated silver film 500 nm thick on the same type of cleaned   observable between the samples stored in air or degassed water.
            Corning glass. The scans are run on the slow speed from 350 nm   However, the sample stored in non-degassed water exhibits sig-
            to  800 nm  with a  step size  of  1.0  nm and  slit width  of  2.0 nm.   nificant coarsening and loss of nanorod morphology. Additional
            First, samples that had been exposed to degassed and non-degassed   microscopy was performed on sets after one hour and 12 hours and
            water for set periods of time were measured after drying the sam-  visible morphology changes, not shown here, which shows similar
            ples in a gentle flow of dry nitrogen. in-situ experiments are per-  but less significant morphological differences. In passing, we note
            formed on Ag nanorods that had been deposited onto the interior   that EDS was also performed on the samples of Figure 1. Although
            of polycarbonate cuvettes. As the baseline, a 500 nm silver film is   the results cannot be directly interpreted due to beam penetration
            deposited onto the interior back side of a polycarbonate cuvette   differences with varying density and chemical composition, quali-
            and the cuvette is filled with degassed water to prevent rapid cor-  tative results indicate an insignificant difference in oxygen between
            rosion of the fresh film. To prevent deposition onto the other inte-  samples in air and degassed water and a significant increase in the
            rior or exterior sides of the cuvette they are masked with Kapton   non-degassed sample.
            tape, which is removed after deposition. Next, cuvettes that have
                                                                A              B              C
            Ag nanorods deposited onto the interior back side are measured
            immediately after filling the cuvette with degassed or non-degassed
            water, respectively. Measurements are taken at set time intervals to
            observe time dependent changes in reflective spectra.


                                                               Figure 1. SEM image of Ag nanorods after exposure to (A) air, (B) degassed
                                                               deionized water, and (C) non-degassed deionized water for 168 hours. The
                       Raman Spectroscopy                      scale bars are 500 nm.

            Raman spectroscopy is performed on a Horiba using Ag nanorod   We next present the changes in optical response caused by the
            samples that had been sensitized in an aqueous solution of 10  M   exposure to the varied conditions, Figure 2. Samples exposed to
                                                       -5
            R6G. R6G solution was prepared in degassed and non-degassed   air for 12 hours are observed to have multiple absorption peaks
            water by mixing in an appropriate amount of R6G powder and   and a strong absorption, owing to surface plasmon resonance ex-
            stirring vigorously for one hour. The degassed solution was pre-  citation,  centered  around  ~400  nm.  Likewise,  after  exposure  to
            pared by stirring the mixing solution while under light vacuum   degassed deionized water, labeled DG H2O in Figure 2, the in-
            to prevent dissolution of air into the mixture. The samples were   tensity of absorption decreases but peak locations are unchanged.
            placed into the respective solutions for 12 hours, then rinsed five   Alternatively, after exposure to non-degassed water for 12 hours,




                                                                                                Shimadzu Journal  vol.9  Issue1 15
   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21