Page 11 - Shimadzu Journal vol.7 Issue2
P. 11

Food Development



            1-3-2. Evaluation of the Newly Developed Analytical Method  1-3-3. Method Application in Sample Analysis
            The performance of the newly developed method of chiral amino acid   To evaluate the usefulness of the LC-MS/MS method for chiral
            analysis using the optimized LC-MS/MS (the LC-MS/MS method) was   amino acid analysis, the method was used for quantitative
            evaluated by examining measurement range, linearity, repeatability,   analysis of D-amino acids in food. Three different types of
            limit of detection, and lower limit of quantitation (Table 1). This   commercially available black vinegar were used as samples.
            evaluation involved using the newly developed method to analyze a   Reports have revealed that vinegar contains several different
            serial dilution of an amino acid standard solution (0.005, 0.01, 0.05,   D-amino acids (Tani et al. 2009; Miyoshi et al. 2014), and a
            0.5, 1, 5, 50, and 100 nmol/mL), dividing the area data for each   number of different bacteria including lactic acid bacteria are
            amino acid by the peak area of an internal standard, and correcting   reported to play a major role in D-amino acid formation in
            for injection errors, etc. that can arise during analysis. In this study,   vinegar (Mutaguchi et al. 2013). First, the three different black
            each validated item was evaluated based on a variety of criteria   vinegars underwent pretreatment. The pretreatment method
            including validation guidelines for analytical method development   reported by Konya et al. (2017), which has been thoroughly
            established by the International Council for Harmonisation of Technical   examined for recovery rates and effect on LC-MS analysis, was
            Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH). The measurement   used for this D-amino acid analysis. Quantitative analysis of
            range was determined by considering the accuracy and trueness of   D-amino acids was performed using a calibration curve created
            analytical values at either extremity and taking the maximum linear   from peak areas obtained by analyzing a serial dilution of an
            range for D-methionine, D-aspartic acid, D-glutamine, and D-glutamic   amino acid standard solution. The serial dilutions used in
            acid (0.005–100 nmol/mL). This produced a high correlation coefficient   quantitative analysis underwent the same pretreatment as
            of 0.99 or above for the respective measurement ranges of each target   vinegar samples and were corrected for extraction errors. All
            amino acid and demonstrated the LC-MS/MS method is capable of   vials intended for analysis also contained a fixed concentration
            quantitative analysis of D-amino acids across a wide dynamic range.   of DL-alanine-2,3,3,3-d4 internal standard, and each data
            Repeatability was evaluated based on the relative standard deviation   point was corrected based on the measured result for
            (RSD) of the area of each peak obtained after analyzing an amino acid   D-alanine-2,3,3,3-d4 to account for injection and ionization
            standard solution three times in succession. A mean RSD of 8.1% was   errors. Target D-amino acids were analyzed simultaneously
            obtained for all target amino acids at 0.05 nmol/mL other from   using CROWNPAK CR-I (+), and CROWNPAK CR-I (-) was used
            D-alanine, and for D-alanine at 0.5 nmol/mL the RSD was 15.9%. An   to detect D-lysine and to identify the peaks of D-isoleucine and
            RSD of not more than 20% for any peak area showed the LC-MS/MS   D-allo-isoleucine.
            method achieves good repeatability. Limits of detection were taken as   The LC-MS/MS method detected and quantified 14 D-amino acids in
            the target compound concentration where the detected peak (signal   the vinegar samples (D-alanine, D-serine, D-valine, D-threonine,
            intensity) was three (or more) times the noise, and limits of quantitation   D-allo-isoleucine, D-leucine, D-asparagine, D-glutamic acid, D-methionine,
            were taken as the target compound concentration where the detected   D-histidine, D-phenylalanine, D-arginine, D-tyrosine, and D-lysine).
            peak (signal intensity) was 10 (or more) times the noise. Noise was   Similar D-amino acids were detected in all three vinegars, though
            calculated from the standard deviation of signals at measurement   D-amino acid concentrations differed in each vinegar. Next, the same
            points in sections before and after target compound detection. Limits   samples were analyzed again within 24 hours by the LC-TOFMS
            of detection differed by amino acid in the concentration range   method. To allow a comparison of results, the separation conditions
            0.005–0.5 nmol/mL and D-amino acids were detectable on the order   used in LC and other analytical conditions were consistent across both
            of several pmol, showing that this method gives favorable results   the LC-TOFMS method and the LC-MS/MS method. The LC-TOFMS
            when used for the analysis of trace amounts of target compounds in   method detected and quantified 13 D-amino acids (D-alanine, D-serine,
            samples.                                           D-valine, D-threonine, D-allo-isoleucine, D-leucine, D-asparagine,
                                                               D-glutamic acid, D-methionine, D-histidine, D-phenylalanine, D-arginine,
            Table 1    Performance Evaluation of the New Method
                                                               and D-tyrosine) in all three vinegars. The quantitative D-amino acid
                          3BOHF  ONPM N-   S   34%      -0%  -02
                                                   ONPM N-     ONPM N-   results obtained by the LC-MS/MS method and LC-TOFMS method
               % BMBOJOF                                       were very similar (Fig. 7). This indicates the LC-MS/MS method can be
               % BSHJOJOF                                       used as an alternative to the existing LC-TOFMS method. Furthermore,
                                                               the LC-TOFMS method did not detect D-lysine in any vinegar or D-valine
               % BTQBSHJOF
                                                               in vinegar C, but the LC-MS/MS method both detected and quantified
              % BTQBSUJD BDJE
                                                               D-lysine in all vinegars and D-valine in vinegar C. The above findings
               % DZTUFJOF                                       demonstrate the LC-MS/MS method is superior to the LC-TOFMS
              % HMVUBNJOF                                        method in terms of quantitation and could be a powerful method for
                                                               quantitative analysis of trace D-amino acids in samples.
             % HMVUBNJD BDJE
               % IJTUJEJOF
               % JTPMFVDJOF
               % MFVDJOF
                % MZTJOF
              % NFUIJPOJOF
             % QIFOZMBMBOJOF
                % TFSJOF
               % UISFPOJOF
              % USZQUPQIBO
               % UZSPQTJOF
                % WBMJOF
            r: correlation coefficient, RSD: relative standard deviation, LOD: limit of detection,
            LOQ: limit of quantitation


                                                                                                                    47
   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16