Page 18 - Shimadzu Journal vol.3 Issue1
P. 18

Environmental Analysis




                                  2,4,5-TP                                            0.05
                             1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene                                   0.07
                              1,1,1-Trichloroethane                                  0.005
                                Vinyl Chloride                                       0.002
                                  Xylenes                                             10
                                Gross Alpha                                         15 pCi/L
                                 Gross Beta                                      4 millirem per year
                           Radium 226 + Radium 228                                   5 pCi/L
                                 Uranium                                             30 ug/L

                                      Table 3  Secondary Drinking Water Contaminants and MCL’s
                                Contaminant                                         MCL (mg/L)
                                 Aluminum                                           0.05 – 0.2
                                  Chloride                                            250
                                  Copper                                               1
                                   Color                                             15 CU
                                  Fluoride                                             2
                          Foaming Agents (Surfactants)                                0.5
                                   Iron                                               0.3
                                 Manganese                                            0.05
                                    pH                                               6.5 – 8.5
                                   Silver                                             0.1
                                  Sulfate                                             250
                           Total Dissolved Solids (TDS)                               500
                                   Zinc                                                5

                                                    18
            The contaminants in bold are those that have been reported in , or are   10. References
            likely to occur in water supplies that have been impacted with production
                                                               1 http://www2.epa.gov/hfstudy/hydraulic-fracturing-water-cycle; accessed May 12, 2014
            or back-flow water. Most of the contaminants in the USEPA drinking water
                                                               2  Mader, D.; Hydraulic Proppant Fracking and Gravel Packing; Elsevier; 1989
            primary and secondary pollutants list are industrial chemicals, such as
                                                               3                                                                                                          ; accessed
            chlorinated solvents and pesticides that are not very likely to be detected in
                                                               May 12, 2014
            oil-field water. Contaminants, such as methane or ethylene glycol, are not
                                                               4  Simultaneous analysis of anionic, amphoteric and non-ionic surfactants using
            on the list and unless specifically tested for will not be reported even if they
                                                               ultra-high speed LC-MS/MS; Paper PO-CON1212E;
            are present. Also, there are no USEPA approved methods for parameters
                                                               5    Rice, E.W., Baird, R.B., Eaton, A.D., and Clesceri, L.S, ;Standard Methods for the
            such as methane or ethylene glycol. Water systems (and laboratories) must
                                                               Examination of Water and Wastewater 22nd Edition, APHA, AWWA, WEF; 2012
            use EPA approved methods to demonstrate compliance with drinking water
                                                               6 http://omrl.eng.ua.edu/Library/Manuscripts/CrosslinkingPapers/SPE90840/SPE9
            regulations. Shimadzu Instruments, such as the GCMS-QP2010SE and the
                                                               0840-3.pdf; accessed May 12, 2014
            ICPE-9000 are fully capable of analyzing fracking water impacted drinking
                                                               7 http://www.halliburton.com/public/cem/contents/Chem_Compliance/web/H02
            water supplies for volatile organics by EPA Methods 524.2, 524.3, and
                                                               686.pdf; accessed May 12, 2014
            524.4, and for trace metals by EPA 200.7 and 200.5.
                                                               8 http://water.epa.gov/scitech/methods/cwa/bioindicators/upload/2007_07_10_
                                                               methods_method_200_7.pdf
            9. Conclusion
                                                               9 http://cdn.intechopen.com/pdfs-wm/44660.pdf, accessed May 12, 2014
            Shale gas deposits are deep below the earth’s surface and recovery of gas is   10  http://www2.epa.gov/sites/production/files/documents/12_Hayes_-_Marcellus_
            expensive and requires millions of gallons of water mixed with chemicals,   Flowback_Reuse_508.pdf
            known as “fracking solution”. Most fracking solution stays underground or   11  Impacts of Shale Gas Wastewater Disposal on Water Quality in Western
            returns to the surface mixed with formation water, also known as   Pennsylvania; Environ. Sci. Technol., 2013, 47 (20), pp 11849–11857
            production water. The shale gas recovery operation risks environmental   12  http://blogs.nicholas.duke.edu/thegreengrok/frackingwater/ accessed May 13, 2014
            contamination of drinking water and surface water as a result of poorly   13 http://www.wef.org/uploadedFiles/Access_Water_Knowledge/Wastewater_Tre
            lined waste ponds, poorly designed wells, or chemical spills. Since the   atment/Fracking%20Factsheet%20Final(1).pdf accesses May 13, 2014
            fracking and production water solutions are very high in Total Dissolved   14 http://www2.epa.gov/sites/production/files/documents/hf-report20121214.pdf
            Solids and chloride ion, contamination of wells can be rapidly and easily   accessed May 13, 2014
            detected. Analysis of the fracking water itself is possible with highly   15 http://www2.epa.gov/sites/production/files/documents/12_Hayes_-_Marcellus_F
            sophisticated instruments, such as those available from Shimadzu.   lowback_Reuse_508.pdf
            Currently approved drinking water methods are sufficient to monitor   16  http://www.epa.gov/osw/hazard/testmethods/sw846/pdfs/8015c.pdf;
            drinking water and source water supplies. One of the problems may be that   accessed May 13, 2014
            drinking water target organic analytes are mostly chlorinated solvents and   17  http://water.epa.gov/drink/contaminants/ accessed May 18, 2014
            pesticides. These compounds are not used in fracking solutions. Methods   18 http://www.uta.edu/news/releases/2013/07/Schug-water-well-contaminant
            for the analysis of methane, alcohols, and glycols should be developed.   s-study.php, accessed May 18, 2014







     18
   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23